A UMass study on video gaming attitudes and behaviors is believed to be the largest in US history.
Gambling is definitely an topic that is important Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two big resort gambling enterprises in the next few years.
The University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a study that gives a baseline for the state of gambling in the state now, one that can then be used to track changes in long term studies in advance of that gaming expansion.
The study, which comes through the educational school of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed almost 10,000 Massachusetts residents.
That is sufficient to help make it the gambling study that is largest ever completed in the United States.
Survey Establishes Baseline for Future Studies
The study was praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who stated it should provide an objective way to understand how a state has been impacted by gambling going forward.
‘The most important point is that we are establishing baseline conditions for every socio and economic variable that would be affected by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our researchers will then track alterations in those variables over the lifetime of the gambling enterprises in purchase to know up to a certainty the effects and also to inform data-driven mitigation strategies for just about any potential negative consequences.’
The study was conducted between 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire september.
The result was a wide range of information detailing exactly how people in Massachusetts gamble and view different forms of gaming.
As an example, it turns out that about 72 % of respondents reported gambling at least onetime on the previous year.
Many Massachusetts residents (about 60 per cent) said they played the lottery, while 22 % reported that they had gone to a casino during the past year.
Residents Like Casinos, However Locally
One topic that is hot the spot has been how Massachusetts’ new casinos will impact current casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are straight to be worried: 65 percent of these Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a portion that should go way down if the Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.
The study also looked into how residents experience the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor or more to three casinos that are full-scale. The clear answer was one that has been heard in many communities through the continuing state: not in my backyard.
A good 59 % majority of adults in Massachusetts said they think gambling expansion will either have neutral impact or be advantageous to the state.
Nevertheless, 46 percent believe that gambling expansion will be harmful within their very own community, while only 28 percent trust casino expansion would be beneficial locally.
The study additionally found that illegal gambling was fairly common in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports in the past year, while two % reporting gambling on unregulated online gaming web sites.
More analysis that is in-depth of data gathered is anticipated to be released in the months in the future. However, principal investigator Rachel Volberg states that the real value in this study ended up being gathering information before views could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.
‘Not many people realize just how unusual it is for a problem gambling study to be completed before some new type of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg said. ‘The Commonwealth is lucky that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission so clearly and forcefully supported such an effort and I am excited to share our findings before any casinos begin operations in our state.’
Interpol Disbands €20 Million Anti-Match-Fixing Relationship With FIFA
FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) after which Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now figured FIFA doesn’t share the fundamental values associated with the police community.’ No shit! (Image: cnn.com)
Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, compensated to it by FIFA, to finance a joint program that is anti-match-fixing.
The 10-year Integrity in Sport initiative was designed to stamp out fixed games orchestrated by criminal betting syndicates, but Interpol stated this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.
‘In light of the context that is current FIFA, while Interpol continues to be committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, I have determined to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All partners that are external whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and principles of the company, too as those of the wider law enforcement community.’
The terms and conditions associated with the deal, signed in 2011, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible with the axioms, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, after the arrest of seven FIFA officials because the result of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer body that is governing not held up its end of the bargain.
It begs the question, though, why was Interpol, using its wide-reaching access to an expansive network of law enforcement agencies, unaware of FIFA corruption in 2011?
The press that is british crying foul as far right back as 2006. This was the year that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul! The Secret World of FIFA: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. The name says it all.
Additionally in 2006, Panorama, a BBC affairs that are current, broadcast a documentary asserting that Sepp Blatter had been investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper more than a FIFA bribery scandal.
Inside it, Lord Triesman, the former president of the English Football Association, described FIFA being an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’,
A Panorama that is follow-up documentary 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he don’t.
Interpol’s willingness to bury its head in the sand might have been more about the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the international police force agency constituted more than one fourth of its annual budget.
Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the united states, the only country that dared to contain the organization to task, it had been too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.
The FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss TV this week, and believe us, it’s a zinger on a lighter note!
‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a car,’ grinned De Gregorio.
‘But that is driving?’ he quizzed.
‘The authorities,’ he zinged.
Fleetingly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had chosen to ‘relinquish his office.’
Ritz Club Sues Tycoon Safa Abdulla Al Geabury Over £2 million Gambling Financial Obligation.
Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million dud check bounced when Ritz staff tried to cash it the time after their gambling spree. (Image: standard.co.uk)
The Ritz Club, London’s famously https://casino-online-australia.net/planet-7-oz-casino-review/ high-end, high-roller casino, is suing a property that is swiss over a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.
According to the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury had written out the check to fund a gambling session one night in February last 12 months, but it ended up being a dud as soon as the casino tried to bank it the morning that is following.
The Ritz is also looking for an£ that is extra ($310,000) in accumulated interest on the debt.
It’s been reported that the casino, that will be owned by reclusive billionaire twins that are identical Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red with a number of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively into the courts.
According to the London night Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the last 12 months alone in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).
Al Geabury’s defense is that he is a gambling addict and his staff should have known this and stopped him from playing.
He desires the debts written off, but he’s on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won an identical High Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the spouse of the Omani international minister.
The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had visited the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a hours that are few. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million ($1.65) of her financial obligation. She promptly counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken benefit of her.
Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her to continue playing a game of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made conscious of her gambling addiction, and also allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was illegal.
She also said that the casino was in fact under a ‘duty of care’ towards her, a responsibility which it had failed to fulfill.
Nevertheless, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a months that are few her visit towards the Ritz.
In governing in favor of the casino, the judge said he was certain that, had Al-Daher been refused authorization to hold in gambling at the Ritz, she ‘would happen eager and inclined to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and very most likely during her stay in London throughout the days or weeks after 3 April 2012.’
The judge within the Al Geabury instance, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, stated at a preliminary hearing that psychiatric reports happen commissioned to assess Al Geabury’s state of mind on the time he lost the money and whether he was in charge of his actions.
‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury has a gambling addiction plus the claimant’s understanding of that,’ she said.