AGA Wants AG Nominee Loretta Lynch Questioned on Illegal Gambling Stance

AGA Wan<span id="more-2228"></span>ts AG Nominee Loretta Lynch Questioned on Illegal Gambling Stance

The AGA desires the Senate to ask US Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch about her plans to enforce laws and regulations against illegal gambling at her confirmation hearing this week.

How does Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch feel about illegal gambling activity? The American Gaming Association (AGA) wants to locate away.

The Attorney General (AG) of the United States has significant value to the gambling industry, after all.

Decisions on how to interpret and prosecute laws around gambling, especially illegal gambling, could have a big effect on the industry and specific players alike: just ask every online poker player whom lost or struggled to regain their funds after the Black Friday indictments in 2011.

Perhaps that’s why the American Gaming Association wants the Senate to have a look that is long hard how a next attorney general plans to manage unlawful gambling laws. Geoff Freeman, president and CEO associated with AGA, has urged the Senate to judge US Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch’s commitment to enforcing laws that are such Wednesday’s verification hearing.

AGA Wants to Hear Lynch on Illegal Sports Betting

‘We urge you to make sure the next attorney general takes really the problem of illegal gambling over the country,’ Freeman wrote in a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), the leading minority member of the committee.

In particular, Freeman really wants to understand what Lynch will do in order to enforce rules against illegal activities betting. That is been issue that Freeman has spoken about extensively in the run-up to your Super Bowl, a meeting that will see an estimated $3.8 billion wagered on it illegally. That dwarfs the $100 million or so that may be bet in the game legally in nevada.

Lynch was the united states Attorney for the Eastern District of ny since 2010. That put her in charge of federal prosecutions on longer Island and in three boroughs of the latest York City.

One of her most notable gambling-related instances included the indictment of 25 people who were accused of running an illegal sports operation that is gambling Queens, the type of crackdown more likely to please Freeman among others whom want illegal sports betting limited whenever possible.

Online Gambling Questions Also Feasible

If gambling does become an interest of conversation during the confirmation hearings, additionally it is possible that Internet gambling questions could be brought up.

It’s clearly a subject of interest right now: several states are looking at gambling that is online (along with three that already offer casino and/or poker games over the Internet), and Sheldon Adelson yet others have forced for the nationwide ban on Internet video gaming.

One sponsor of an Internet gambling ban, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, making questions that are such the more likely.

But concerns over the legality of online gambling had beenn’t specifically mentioned by Freeman in his letter. This is simply not surprising, since the AGA announced year that is last it would officially stay from the online gambling debate due to having prominent members on both sides of the problem.

Lynch was nominated ahead of some other applicants on President Barack Obama’s short list, the one that allegedly contained another title that online gambling fans are aware of: Preet Bharara. The case that began with 11 indictments on Black Friday on April 15, 2011 as the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Bharara was the prosecutor who initiated United States v. Scheinberg.

Current US AG Eric Holder will vacate his position as soon as a new attorney general is confirmed by the Senate.

While Holder has not spearheaded any major initiatives related to gambling, he did recently put an end to some ‘equitable seizure’ agreements between the us government and local police departments, a program that permitted police more leeway in seizing cash and property during arrests: a policy especially dangerous to poker players who may carry large bankrolls in cash in their cars.

Attorney General Nominee Loretta Lynch Grilled by RAWA Spearheader Lindsey Graham on Online Gambling Views

US AG nominee Loretta Lynch at yesterday’s hearing. Despite being quizzed by Senator Lindsey Graham, she refused to be drawn down in the relevant concern of on the web gambling. (Image:

Loretta Lynch nicely sidestepped the issue of online gambling when quizzed on the subject at yesterday’s US Attorney General confirmation hearing.

The question was put to the AG nominee by Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), among the co-sponsors of the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA). RAWA seeks to ban all forms of online gambling on a level that is federal aside from gambling horseracing and dream sports.

Lynch told Graham that while she was ‘generally familiar’ with the DoJ’s controversial 2011 legal interpretation for the 1961 Wire Act, she ‘had not read the decision’ and so she was ‘not able to investigate it’ for him.

The DoJ’s reinterpretation of the act and its legal opinion that the Wire Act prohibits only recreations betting over the Web effectively launched the door for the state that is state-by of online poker and on-line casino gaming, a decision that RAWA seeks to overturn.

Diplomatic Answers

Graham replied that he would send Lynch relevant material on the subject, but maybe not before he’d delivered his parting shot.

‘Would you agree certainly one of the best ways for a terrorist organization or an unlawful enterprise in order to enrich themselves is to have online video gaming that would be really difficult to regulate?’ he asked the nominee.

‘What we have seen with respect to people who provide material support and funding to terrorist businesses is they’ll use any methods to finance those organizations,’ reacted Lynch, diplomatically.

Despite exactly what might have looked like a testy interchange, Graham was reported to be ‘inclined’ to support Lynch’s nomination after what he tweeted was an ‘excellent and effective opening statement.’

AGA Requires a Stance

It is not just the anti-online gambling faction that is clamoring to listen to Lynch’s views on the issue, either.

Them to choose a new AG who is willing to address the issue of illegal gambling in the US as we reported earlier in the week, Geoff Freeman, chairman of the American Gaming Association (AGA), recently wrote to Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), the leading minority member of the committee, exhorting.

‘We urge you to make certain the next attorney general takes really the problem of illegal gambling across the country,’ Freeman wrote.

Freeman is anxious to draw the attention of politicians towards the scale of illegal sports betting, which he believes is definitely an argument for wider regulation and legalization. The AGA recently estimated that at least $3.8 billion could be wagered illegally on Sunday’s Super Bowl by People in america across the nation.

Renewed Push from Adelson

Meanwhile, reports suggest that Sheldon Adelson has met independently with Republican members of the home Judiciary Committee in an effort to renew the push to prohibit on the web gambling after it faltered year that is last. This may explain Graham’s eagerness to publicly grill the AG that is new candidate.

Both sponsors of RAWA have actually returned to Washington with increased energy and influence than they held year that is last. Both now sit on their chamber’s judiciary committees, while Graham is now a known member of the Republican majority and Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) had been recently made president of the Government Oversight and Reform Committee.

Match-Fixing, Honey Traps, and Blackmail: Simply Not the Cricket World Cup

Heath Mills, chief executive for the Cricket Players Association, warns that players are in risk from predatory betting syndicates who may look for to blackmail them into illegally influencing matches during the World that is forthcoming Cup. (Image:

The Cricket World Cup is practically that this story is about glamorous femme fatales, blackmail, criminal betting syndicates and match-fixing upon us, but before half the world stops reading, let us remind you. So stay with us.

The chief executive of the Cricket Players Association (CPA), has said he believes betting syndicates will attempt to influence the outcome of matches as Australia and New Zealand prepare to host the upcoming international championships, Heath Mills.

He has warned players about the dangers of falling prey to traps that are honey blackmail.

The betting syndicates are becoming ever more devious in their methods, and Mills is taking this risk so seriously that he’s got ready a 90-minute presentation on match-fixing for the benefit of the players.

‘Always a Married Man’

‘I have actually no question that match groups that are fixing be looking at New Zealand and that they have had people on the ground in New Zealand previously,’ said Mills, who added that players had been frequently groomed for decades ahead of the trap was set. ‘The honey trap might be part of the grooming process where there are compromising images … They may notice anyone has family problems, or they might notice they’ve got monetary issues or mental health issues, which they are able to jeopardize to expose.’

Mills said that New Zealand’s players were particularly at danger because many of them were just semi-professional and relatively low paid.

The CPA, he added, had been contacted on many occasions within the past ten years by players who believed they’d been approached by match-fixers.

Brand New Zealand Racing Board TAB spokesman Mark Stafford, whoever organization is co-sponsoring the initiative, recounted the tale of a player that has met a female whom reported to represent a major brand.

The player signed a ‘sponsorship’ deal and she took him to an accommodation that were fitted out with secret cameras.

‘It’s always a married man in those situations,’ Stafford explained.


In 2010, three members regarding the Pakistan national team, including its fast bowler Mohammad Amir, were embroiled in a ‘spot-fixing’ scandal if they had been found to be section of a plot to bowl a series of ‘no balls’ through the Lord’s Test against England.

They received prison sentences and were banned from the game.

The rise of in-play online betting, where customers can bet on practically every part of a match, has made the exploitation of these seemingly innocuous moments in games, for instance the quantity of ‘no balls’ in a cricket match, increasingly possible in modern times.

Meanwhile, Australia authorities said it had intelligence that players were already planning to influence matches on behalf of the syndicates.

Match fixing became a crime in New Zealand last year, because of the passage of the Crimes (Match Fixing) Amendment Bill.

This gave police extra powers to investigate suspicious incidences and set a maximum penalty of seven years in jail for those convicted.

Leave a Reply

Scroll Up